Connect
To Top

Breaking: Fox News’ Hannity Confirmed as The Secret Client of Michael Cohen

Cohen’s Possible Third Associate Unveiled

Michael Cohen, the personal lawyer of President Trump, had attempted to cover up the personality of the person he’s working for in a lawsuit that was filed earlier on, to avoid exposing him to the public.

The anchor for Fox News, Sean Hannity, who is well-known to be a blunt supporter of President Trump and for always displaying vicious verbal attacks on TV against Robert Mueller, the special investigator, became an object of exposure last Monday when he was named one of the 3 associates whom Cohen worked for last year and this year.

Cohen attempted ways to conceal Hannity’s identity from public scrutiny in a lawsuit that was filed some time ago. The legal personnel said there were 3 associates he worked for; President Trump, and the sometimes vice chairman for finance working for the Republican National Committee, Elliott Broidy, the same Broidy who got one woman he once dated pregnant and afterward bribed her.

However, he said the third person he worked for wanted to remain anonymous. At the proceedings on Monday, Kimba Wood, the American District Judge, demanded that Cohen’s lawyer must reveal the last client’s name, and the lawyer obeyed, he said the hidden client’s name is Hannity.

Sean Hannity denied having any legal dealings with Cohen but admitted that they have a cordial relationship

Unknown Reason

During his live broadcasts of the early morning radio program, Hannity mentioned that even if he didn’t hire Cohen through the conventional method, the two of them have the right to a lawyer-client relationship.

He emphasized that he never handed over any case to Cohen, neither had he ever gotten any account statement from him nor paid lawyer’s fees. They only have the privilege since he requested for such from Cohen directly.

On Monday afternoon, Hannity posted on Twitter that it’s assumed by him that the communications between him and Cohen were off the records, but for clarity, their talks didn’t have anything to do with himself and an outsider. He went on to say that the talks primarily focused on real estate.

Hannity is a die-hard and constant fan of President Trump, either on or off the airwaves, and he continuously lambasted Mueller’s probe into the suspected alliance with Russia during the elections of 2016. In addition, he never stopped backing up Cohen even after his offices and residence were forayed by the FBI.

On Monday, few hours following the raid, he expressed his opinions of Mueller during his News program on Fox by saying that Mueller desperately wanted to nail Trump by all possible means, just as he (Hannity) had insinuated before.

Fox News anchor, Hannity, live on TV condemning Mueller’s actions on Cohen and defending the president’s government.

He pointed out that Cohen had never taken part in the government being controlled by Trump, nor did he participate in Trump’s campaign. Everything is clear to him that officially, there are desperate measures in place to overthrow and possibly remove Trump from office. However, professionals on ethics are asking why was the so-called “lawyer-client” relationship not disclosed before by Hannity and Fox News?

Who is Entitled to the Confiscated Documents?

A representative of Fox News declined to comment on the link between Cohen and Hannity. The hearing on Monday grew from one proposal to establish a short-term restraining law requested for earlier by Cohen with the goal of stopping federal counsels from checking documents collected during the search authorization on Monday.

At the proceedings, Trump’s lawyer, Joanna Hendon, noted that the president has the right to be the first to analyze the seized documents from his lawyer because he’s the real privileged possessor. In a bid to dispute Hendon’s defense, Thomas McKay, the Assistant US Attorney, countered that the mere fact that Cohen is vested with an influential client is not an automatic license for him to be treated distinguishly.

McKay feels that there may be incriminating contents in the seized materials and some suspicious comments between Trump and Cohen will start sparking media scrutiny soon.

The main subject in the scrutiny and likely federal atrocities are yet to be revealed from the office of the American attorney, but one Friday filing showed how they affirmed that Cohen’s name is under scrutiny at the federal crime probe. Federal attorneys stated in the filing that the probe, which took them out to foray his offices, were mainly based on some of his private business transactions which have lasted for some months, but last Monday, Wood stated that the search authorization would still be kept under wraps.

Also present at the hearing was Stormy Daniels, who was rumored to be Trump’s mistress 12 years ago.

More in Advisor

You must be logged in to post a comment Login